Church statistics are to be treated with great caution.
This magazine recently reported that the Catholic Church in Norway has been growing by leaps and bounds.
To a large extent this is broadly true.
At the Reformation,
Catholicism was totally extirpated in Norway, and it was very slow in
coming back.
As recently as 1971, there were fewer than 10,000 Catholics
in the entire country. Now there are about ten times that number.
Just recently, the Church has opened a new Cathedral in Trondheim,
dedicated to Saint Olav, at the consecration of which the Pope was
represented by our very own Cardinal Cormac Murphy O’Connor.
A little trip around the Cathedral website gives you a snapshot of Catholic life in Norway.
The Cathedral clergy are either Polish or Norwegian converts from Lutheranism.
Mass is celebrated in Norwegian, Latin, Tagalog, Polish and Tamil, though there is no Mass in Spanish “for the time being”.
The Church in Norway has recently run into trouble over the
subventions it receives from the state, and has reportedly been found
guilty of inflating the number of adherents in order to gain more money.
The Trondheim website explains the background to the matter:
“In Norway, the state pays all religious organisations a fixed
sum for each registered member. This contribution is a type of church
tax to help the organisation in their spiritual and social work for
their members. Catholics arriving in Norway are therefore asked to
officially register with their local Church to ensure that the Church
receives this financial contribution. In recent years the number of
immigrants from Catholic countries has been numerous, and Oslo Catholic
Diocese has registered individuals they assumed were Catholics without
asking them personally.”
The Guardian has a report on the matter here.
It is pretty embarrassing for the Church to be accused of fraud and
playing the system for its own advantage.
Clearly the Church will have
to proceed carefully in future if it is to avoid breaking the law again,
and that will mean being careful to understand what exactly it is that
the law requires.
But the real question many will ask is why the Norwegian state pays
this grant to religious bodies in the first place.
After all, in most
countries, the Church is purely self-financing, though it may get, as in
Britain, certain advantages in the form of charitable status and grants
for the maintenance of historic buildings.
But why have a Church tax, either on the German model, or the
Norwegian model?
Why not rely on the faithful putting their hands in
their pockets, and, if they haven’t got deep pockets, why not just be a
poor Church?
To ask these questions is not to get in a dig at our Norwegian
brethren, who probably need the money and understandably wanted to
maximise the grant from the state, as we all would in similar
circumstances.
But it is to ask a question that applies to the Church in
all countries, namely, what is the relationship between Church and
State?
Too close a relationship between the Church and State can be
disastrous, as the Church recognises.
This is what underlies concerns
about the current situation in China.
As readers of this magazine will know,
many have justified fears that the Chinese government, officially
communist and atheist, may soon be granted a recognised role in the
appointment of bishops.
I for one would not want to have anything to do with a bishop
appointed by the Chinese government; the concept of an atheist and
communist government appointing bishops is simply absurd.
Catholic
monarchs appointed bishops in days gone by, but they were largely devout
men and women.
The Chinese cannot pretend to be so.
As for the situation in Norway, if this were to bring the current
arrangement into disrepute and lead to its abolition, this might not be a
disaster.
The Church would then be free of such a tie to the state; and
as Norway is still a missionary territory in so many ways, it could
rely on contributions channeled through the Church’s missionary
agencies.